
The people that know me, know too well how I have a keen interest in Weather. I am intrigued in extreme weather. I like very Hot weather, I like very cold. This perhaps is because I live in a country that is affected by maritime weather. The jet stream from the atlantic feeds the UK with warm air masses often sent as low pressure. Mild, cloudy, unsettled and wet weather keeps the UK protected from the more harsher, colder easterly weather that she should have considering its location on earth.
Few understand however that I have an interest in weather for a particular reason. I see weather and how it works having a great effect on the world. It affects people, animals and ecosystems naturally. However, what most people fail to recognize that it also has an effect on global economies and if I dare say, the evolution of our civilization.
I don’t pretend to be an expert. However I believe that non-experts can sometimes give the experts a different perspective and often helps complacency. It is easy to be an expert and lose sight of the bigger picture that can often lead to failing to achieve anything. Let’s start by trying to look at the main things that are linked to establishing whether there is Global warming and whether Man is contributing to it?
Weather Forecasting
The first tool in monitoring and predicting outcomes of the weather is Weather forecasting. Sure, there are much more that is done to examine the weather and how our activities impact it. However, currently in the UK we have the Met office that has a responsibility to forecast the weather. The Met office feeds the BBC and ITV with their information in order to broadcast their predictions.
The methods that the Met office use is very common throughout the world. It tries to predict behavior of the weather by a supercomputer that gathers all information such as surface pressure, temperature, precipitation (Water in the air) etc and creates models. The Supercomputer then calculates guesses of several scenarios that can happen. The Weather experts then use their knowledge to try and logically judge the likely outcome. The problem with this method is that this method is purely guessing on symptoms of weather rather than causes. You are more likely to predict the weather correctly if you can determine what caused the symptoms in the place.
There are several Weather Scientists that believe that they can find the cause through activities of the Sun. Piers Corbyn from weatheraction.com is one of those scientists that measures the amount of energy that is sent to earth to predict how the weather is going to react. Piers calculates the amount of energy released in levels 1-5. The higher the number the more reactive the surface pressures are. It is quite difficult for me really to explain so I would suggest you read this up. In essence the moral of the story Piers and others is trying to convince is that the biggest contributor to global weather and warming is the Sun. This is not taken to consideration by methods used by the Met Office.
Impartiality
The Global Warming phenomenon in the last decade has turned into a very politically driven cause. This is quite natural. However, the body used to predict weather for the UK has been given also the responsibility to drive this campaign of Global Warming. The problem here is impartiality. It is quite natural for a body to tweak its results to fit an agenda. If the consensus of the Met office is that global temperatures are increasing and it needs to prove this with the results from it weather predictions then it is very difficult for it to embrace the latter.
The observations I have had of the Met office and BBC forecasting is that the word Mild / Milder is used far too extensively and too easily. Whenever there is a period of milder weather, it seems the MET and The BBC continues to press on the word mild. If it is the latter, they tend to limit the the amount of time the word Cold is used. Last December the UK experienced a milder than usual Christmas. However, looking at the UK as a whole this was not true for the majority of the North of the UK. Also the reason for this mild was down to an unexpected activity of solar sun spots that caused the extra torpedo lows from the Atlantic to the UK giving us a more unsettled, windy warm weather. This changed this February when this activity weakened allowing large High Pressure to form over Europe bring in very cold easterly temperatures. However The BBC was one of the first to jump on the Mild bandwagon once the High Weakened. They even said that winter was now over. This is however too early to predict and also take into consideration that the Met office predictions have been limited to 48hrs and anything further than that is very unreliable.
The problem here is that you have a body championing the political agenda of global warming and not appearing to be independent. This truly a worrying thing! This is worrying because government, business and economies rely on accurate impartial recommendations in order to prepare itself properly.
The effect of the Global Warming agenda
Decisions made by Global Warming experts affect how a country spends money and resources. Policies are created and this can have beneficial but also negative impact on the economy, its people and its environment.
If Global warming exists, are we tackling the issues correctly?
Currently the EU is predicted to spend 250 million dollars to reduce carbon emissions on the belief that Man is contributing to the warming of the planet. Bjorn Lomborg is a leading expert who produced a film called “Cool It”. In this film Bjorn scrutinizes the goal and strategy of Global Warmists Agenda stating that the money is currently in the view of achieving to reduce the earths temperatures by a little as 0.1 degrees. Bjorn cleverly shows that this money can be invested more strategically by focusing on issues that are affected right now not assuming what will in near future. Bjorn concentrates on ecosystems and renewable energy. He strongly believes and argues well that tackling the issue and spending in this way will be more beneficial not only to the environment but also to peoples day to day lives.
Governments create policies and taxes that affect people who contribute and people that benefit from it. If the whole global warming evidence is not accurate then this has truly and unfairly put people, economies and certainly the environment at a disadvantage.
Is Man contributing to Global warming?
Recently the Met office UK published statistics that the World Temperatures have actually decreased since 1997 by 0.8 degrees. This is a problem. This goes against the estimations so far that the Met had predicted. They predicted that temperatures would increase due to the Carbon emissions released by man.
Piers Corbyn is in the view that Co2 naturally increases with the activities of the Sun. The more activities there are on the Sun the warmer the climate becomes and argues that this naturally increases Co2 levels in the atmosphere. Many scientists are in the belief that activities in the Sun is decreasing and the world is likely to be cooling over the next few decades. The counter argument given by the Met Office is that although this may be the case, the damage caused by our CO2 emission will counter the Sun’s effect of cooling.
Conclusion
I believe that we are in a very difficult position. I am not confident that we have truly considered all that affects the earths climate enough to justify policies and expenditures in place that affects countries, economies, people and most importantly the environment. The impartiality of the Met office is not to be desired and should be scrutinized. We have to embrace not condemn other scientific beliefs such as Piers Corbyn’s Solar effect and of others beliefs on weather and climate. This needs to be taken into consideration especially when such serious decisions are made in reaction to it. Bjorn’s approach to tackling the climate, environment and resource issue should be looked up to and a different approach is certainly needed.
Does Man affect climate with Co2? It does increase the amount of CO2 released however to what extent this has to cause the earth to warm up due to the earth’s ability to absorb CO2 and create CO2 itself is another question. What I do believe in is that Man is affecting it’s own capabilities of dealing with the issue correctly due to himself. What is clear to me right now is that we need to rethink the Global Warming issue but more importantly tackle how we deal with the earth’s resource and able to sustain it without causing problems for the whole planet. We can also certainly use the methods by Piers’ predictions to help better for extreme weather but also to understand how climate is truly affected.



